The competition between the Coros Pace 4 and the Garmin Forerunner 165 underscores the rapid evolution of sports watches. Both models are recognized as top-tier options that incorporate advanced features previously reserved for high-end devices costing significantly more. These entry-level watches provide enough functionality to meet the demands of serious athletes, all while maintaining a lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear.
After extensive testing of both watches, including weeks of daily use and direct comparisons, distinct advantages for each device have emerged. The **Coros Pace 4** excels with superior sports tracking capabilities and longer battery life, while the **Garmin Forerunner 165** impresses with its smart features and beginner-friendly tools.
Pricing and Availability
The **Coros Pace 4** debuted in November 2025, retailing at **$249** or **£229**. This pricing positions it as a budget-friendly alternative to the **Garmin Forerunner 165**, which has a standard model priced at **$249.99** or **£249.99**, and a music-enabled version available for **$299.99** or **£289.99**. The Pace 4 is offered in black or white, with optional nylon or silicone bands, and is seen as a strong value proposition at its full retail price.
In contrast, the **Garmin Forerunner 165**, released in February 2024, is frequently available at discounted rates, typically selling for **$199** or **£199** for the standard model and **$249** or **£249** for the music version. Current promotions on platforms like Amazon can reduce prices by up to **$50**, making it an attractive option for bargain hunters.
Specifications and Design
Both watches feature lightweight plastic cases and glass displays, weighing approximately **40g** with a silicone strap and around **30g** with a nylon strap. The **Forerunner 165** offers a broader range of color options and utilizes **20mm** straps compared to the **22mm** straps of the Pace 4. Both models have a **1.2-inch** AMOLED display, providing vibrant visuals and ease of use.
While the Coros Pace 4 has a more minimalist design with only three buttons, including a digital dial, the Garmin Forerunner 165 features five buttons that facilitate easier navigation. Both devices are rated **5ATM** for water resistance, and they share essential sensors such as a barometric altimeter. The Pace 4 provides multi-band GPS tracking, enhancing accuracy in challenging environments, whereas the Forerunner 165 relies on all-systems GPS.
The Coros Pace 4 is equipped with a built-in microphone, allowing users to take voice notes for workout logs, a feature absent in the Forerunner 165.
Sports Tracking and Training Analysis
As a comprehensive multisport watch, the Coros Pace 4 includes a triathlon mode, making it suitable for diverse athletic activities. In contrast, the Forerunner 165 is primarily designed for runners and lacks the ability to connect with cycling power meters, which the Pace 4 does.
The Pace 4 can display up to eight statistics simultaneously, while the Forerunner 165 is limited to four. Additionally, the Coros device offers detailed training analysis, including insights into training load, a feature typically reserved for more expensive models in Garmin’s range.
The Forerunner 165 edges out with its daily suggested workouts, which can help novice runners maintain a balanced training routine.
GPS and Heart Rate Accuracy
During testing, the **Garmin Forerunner 165** demonstrated commendable GPS accuracy, aligning closely with data from multi-band watches like the Pace 4. However, the multi-band capability of the Pace 4 provides reassurance for those who prioritize precision, especially in urban areas or densely wooded locations.
When comparing heart rate accuracy, both watches performed well against chest strap monitors. While the Pace 4 occasionally registered erratic spikes during easy runs and high readings during intense intervals, it generally maintained a slight edge in GPS accuracy, while the Forerunner 165 consistently showed better heart rate precision.
Battery Life and Smart Features
Battery endurance is a crucial consideration for athletes. The Coros Pace 4 outperforms the Forerunner 165 in both watch and GPS modes, lasting up to **20 days** in watch mode and **24 hours** with GPS tracking. In contrast, the Forerunner 165 typically lasts **three to four days** with the always-on display activated.
Smart features are more limited on the Coros Pace 4, offering basic notifications and a weather widget. It can store MP3 files for Bluetooth playback but lacks streaming service integration. The Forerunner 165, particularly the music version, supports popular streaming services and includes NFC payment capabilities through Garmin Pay.
Both watches provide navigation through breadcrumb trails, although neither includes offline maps.
Conclusion: Which Watch Reigns Supreme?
Ultimately, while both the Coros Pace 4 and Garmin Forerunner 165 have notable strengths, the **Coros Pace 4** emerges as the superior sports watch. For those prioritizing sports tracking features and battery life, the Pace 4 is the clear choice. The Garmin Forerunner 165, however, remains a strong contender for users who value music streaming capabilities.
With Garmin’s more affordable lineup in need of an update, the Forerunner 165 could soon be succeeded by a newer model. Until then, savvy shoppers may find the Forerunner 165 available at competitive prices, particularly for those who do not require music functionality.
In summary, both watches cater to different needs, but the choice ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities in a sports watch.
