Connect with us

Politics

Thousands March in Western New York for ‘No Kings’ Movement

editorial

Published

on

Thousands rallied across Western New York on October 18, 2025, as part of the nationwide “No Kings” movement, expressing opposition to the policies of former President Donald Trump. The protests, which drew an estimated 5,000 participants, highlighted various concerns, including the deployment of the National Guard in cities, reductions in social programs like Medicaid, and intensified immigration enforcement.

In Rochester, participants gathered at Genesee Gateway Park, where Jalen Wims emphasized the importance of civic engagement. “We can take a second out of our busy lives to show up for a cause or something that we deem is important,” Wims stated. “We can make a change and we can do that in a positive way.” The atmosphere was charged, with demonstrators holding signs and chanting slogans, reflecting a diverse coalition of voices united against Trump’s policies.

The movement resonated particularly with young activists. Natalia Orozco, a student from Colombia pursuing her education in the U.S., articulated her motivation for participating. “I’m here today because I want to be heard. There are some issues in this country that affect me and my future.” Her sentiments were echoed by 18-year-olds Hayden Damer and Chase Kennedy, who expressed enthusiasm about voting for the first time. Damer remarked, “We’re the future of America and the country. I think a lot more of us should be out here and participating.”

The protests unfolded during a significant political moment, as the United States approached the third week of a Republican-led shutdown of the federal government. In Fairport, demonstrator Nathan Leedom responded to House Speaker Mike Johnson’s characterization of the “No Kings” movement as “Hate America rallies.” Leedom countered, “Look at all these American flags. Look at all these people who love this country — and they hate what they see.”

Concerns over healthcare were also a prominent theme among protesters. Roxanne, a participant who discussed her health insurance worries, expressed anxiety about being unable to afford necessary treatments. “I feel like I’ll just be left out to die because I won’t be able to afford my health insurance,” she said, highlighting the human impact of current policy decisions.

Dr. Arnold Matlin, from Genesee Valley Citizens for Peace, organized rallies in nearby Livingston County. He noted the importance of activism even in typically conservative areas, stating, “These are the places where we need to come out, full of activists as you can see.”

Responses from political leaders have varied. House Speaker Mike Johnson took to social media platform X to assert that the protests were funded by “Soros” and associated with “far-left and communist groups.” He referred to the events as “Hate America Rally,” an assertion that drew backlash from participants who emphasized their patriotic intentions.

In a related statement, former President Trump dismissed the notion that he embodies a “king.” “They’re referring to me as a king. I’m not a king,” he stated, addressing the criticisms aimed at his administration. Monroe GOP Chair Peter Elder added, “If we truly lived under a king, this protest wouldn’t be allowed. The very ability to speak out is a testament to the freedom we all share — and we fully support that right, for everyone.”

As the “No Kings” movement continues to mobilize supporters, it underscores a growing discontent with current policies and a desire for change among a diverse group of citizens. The protests serve as a reminder of the enduring power of public demonstrations in shaping the political landscape in the United States.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.