In a recent letter to the editor, John Wiercinski expressed concern over the disconnect between the values espoused by MAGA supporters and the core teachings of Christianity. Wiercinski, writing from Dickson City, highlights the irony that many who identify as MAGA Christians appear to support policies that contradict fundamental Christian principles such as love, acceptance, and care for marginalized communities.
Exploring the Irony of MAGA Christian Support
Throughout both of Donald Trump’s first term and the initial year of his second term, Wiercinski noted a troubling pattern. He questioned how individuals who profess their faith in Jesus, who emphasized compassion and acceptance, could endorse policies perceived as cruel. This includes the treatment of immigrants, the LGBT community, and those with physical or mental challenges, as well as issues surrounding access to healthcare.
Wiercinski introduced a concept he refers to as “Vertical Morality,” which he describes as a framework that some MAGA Christians may adopt. This framework suggests that moral guidance is derived from authority figures rather than a genuine understanding of compassion and empathy toward others. In this view, followers may prioritize obedience to their leaders’ directives over the intrinsic values of love and empathy that are central to Christian teachings.
In contrast, Wiercinski advocates for what he terms “Horizontal Morality.” This approach emphasizes the importance of genuine empathy, compassion, and love for others, recognizing that actions can have a meaningful impact on individuals and communities. He argues that this perspective is vital, especially during the Christmas season, a time traditionally associated with kindness and charity.
Encouraging Reflection Among MAGA Christians
Wiercinski calls for MAGA Christians to reflect on the differences between these two moral frameworks. He urges them to consider how their political beliefs align with their faith and to seek a deeper understanding of the teachings of Jesus. This conversation is essential for fostering a more compassionate and inclusive approach to politics and community engagement.
As discussions about the intersection of faith and politics continue, the challenge remains for individuals to reconcile their beliefs with the actions and policies they support. Wiercinski’s letter serves as a reminder of the ongoing dialogue about morality, authority, and compassion within the context of contemporary political landscapes.
