UPDATE: A recall effort against L.A. Councilmember Imelda Padilla has officially launched, as the Los Angeles City Clerk’s Office has just approved a petition for circulation. Organizers are now racing to collect 18,509 valid signatures, which represent 15% of registered voters in District 6, by February 18, 2026, to trigger a special election.
The notice from the City Clerk, issued Wednesday afternoon, marks a significant step in the push to potentially remove Padilla from office. The petition was filed on November 10 and cleared for circulation on November 12. If successful, the petition will be presented to the City Council, which must call a special election within 20 days to allow voters to decide Padilla’s fate.
The recall effort began on September 23, initiated by five residents from the San Fernando Valley: James Adrian Stein, Steven Leffert, Gwendolyn Flynn, Stephen Fredreick Smith, and Karen Schatz. They all reside within the Sixth City Council District, which encompasses neighborhoods such as Sun Valley, Van Nuys, Panorama City, and Lake Balboa.
Tensions have escalated over housing developments proposed in both Sun Valley and Lake Balboa, where residents argue that projects are being pushed through without adequate community input. A controversial 208-bed tiny home village is proposed in Sun Valley, while Lake Balboa residents are opposing a 194-unit affordable housing development near a school, citing serious concerns about safety and increased traffic.
In their statement, the recall proponents accused Padilla of “a pattern of behavior and decisions that have failed to represent the best interests of our community,” claiming misconduct, lack of transparency, and disregard for community feedback. They emphasized, “The recall of Councilmember Padilla is about restoring trust and ensuring our council reflects the will of the people.”
Padilla responded to these allegations, asserting they are false and expressing her disappointment. She stated, “I have been focused, determined, and dedicated fully to improving the quality of life in Council District 6.” Highlighting her efforts in addressing homelessness, enhancing public safety, and engaging with the community, Padilla reassured residents that her office is committed to “keeping our youth, seniors, and families safe.”
Concerns continue to mount in Sun Valley regarding the tiny home village, as critics argue it could exacerbate existing issues related to safety and sanitation. In response to earlier protests, Padilla’s office held a community meeting, and she introduced a motion to improve safety measures around the Metrolink station, which was approved by the City Council on September 3.
In Lake Balboa, the affordable housing development has sparked backlash from residents who feel excluded from the decision-making process. Frustration boiled over during a neighborhood watch meeting in June, with residents claiming they were kept in the dark about the project. While Padilla has facilitated meetings between the developer and local stakeholders, many residents feel their voices are not being heard.
As this recall effort gains traction, the implications for local governance and community trust in leadership are significant. With the deadline for signatures rapidly approaching, the urgency for both Padilla and her challengers is palpable. Community members are now poised to decide whether their councilmember remains in office or if a new representative will take her place.
Residents are encouraged to stay informed and involved as this situation develops, with the potential for a special election looming on the horizon. This recall effort is not just a political maneuver; it is a reflection of the community’s desire for accountable leadership and responsive governance.
